PDA

View Full Version : Modern Conklin Glider



Ray-VIgo
May 10th, 2013, 11:52 PM
I. Appearance: 9.5/10
The modern Conklin Glider pays homage to the classic chased pens popular from the early 1900s through the 1930s. The Glider recreates both the general look and feel of chasing as well as some of the design features of Conklin pens from the early 20th century. The pen’s black plastic and wavy chasing recreates the black chased hard rubber popular on a variety of brands, while its see-saw floating clip and general clip shape are derived from the actual vintage Conklin offerings. The two-tone nib is done tastefully and has a certain vintage-style plainness, but the precision of the engraving and style of plating look modern. The overall shape of the pen is similar to many offerings of the 1910s-20s, a slightly tapered flattop style. The pen is much larger than the common offerings of the vintage period, however. The chasing itself is crisp and deep, with each notch considerably larger than the vintage chasing you might find on an old Waterman or Mabie Todd.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v516/SirMike1983/IMG_2718.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v516/SirMike1983/IMG_2715.jpg

II. Feel In Hand: 8.5/10
This is a medium-large pen, even by modern standards. Compared to vintage pens from the period re-created, it is very large. It is in the same ballpark as a full sized 1920s Duofold, which was a very large pen in the 1920s. The nib is also very large compared to the chased pens of the 1910s and 20s, and is comparable to a full sized 1920s Duofold nib as well. However, because the pen is made of modern plastic and is a hollow shell containing a cartridge or converter, the pen is not very heavy unposted. Posted, the pen takes on noticeable weight, owing to the fact that the inner cap is brass. If you prefer a large but light pen, unposted will work nicely. If you prefer something very hefty, posting is necessary. Be warned that posting may cause scars on the body and chasing with repeated use. The profile of the section is relatively fat, and has an overall shape similar to a Waterman 52, but larger. It is a classic hour-glass type shape. The pen is a comfortable writer, but quite large. The chasing is crisp and deep. It is comfortable for long writing sessions in adult hands, but may be large for people used to something much smaller. If you’re used to a Waterman 52 and are wanting a modern variation on that style, this pen will feel quite large to you. It would get a 9 for capturing the contours of a classic Waterman 52 in the section, but loses a little because it is such a large pen.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v516/SirMike1983/IMG_2714.jpg


III. Filling: 8.5/10
The pen uses a converter or cartridge. SPECIAL NOTE: the converter that comes with the pen screws into the section. This gives an excellent, tight fit. However, you must UNSCREW; do not attempt to just pull it out as you might on a normal converter. The converter holds an average amount of ink for a converter, but is weak compared to the vintage self-fillers considering the size of this pen. Expect to fill this pen regularly (at least once or twice per week, if not more) if you write with it regularly. The filling is simple using the converter and poses no difficulty. Cartridge is also convenient in a rush. It gets an 8 because of the low capacity, but the screw-on converter has a nice, robust connection so an extra half point for that.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v516/SirMike1983/IMG_2716.jpg

IV. Writing: Stock- 6.5, as modified- 9
The pen has a modern nib that is non-flexible, but which has much more give than a common manifold. The nib has a spherical tip, common to most modern pens. The feed is a modern, plastic comb with a short tail and big “step” down to the main body of the feed. Flow is accomplished by two parallel slits. I found the slits to be too small stock. The pen was balky and dry. I modified the two slits to be larger. One slit was actually somewhat mal-formed in parts and needed to be opened completely. Once the feed and nib were tuned, the pen wrote with a consistent, smooth, wet line. Flow was consistent with any good, vintage pen.
Bearing down creates a modest line variation, but the nib is by no means flexible. The nib-feed unit screws in similar to a Pelikan unit. The unit can be taken down by gently pulling the nib and feed out of the collar, but this should not be done unless something is wrong. Unscrewing the unit as a whole is sufficient for cleaning.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v516/SirMike1983/IMG_2712.jpg

V. Durability: 9/10
The pen is modern plastic, which resists fading much better than the old black hard rubber offerings did. The clip has a robust spring under it, but care should be taken to avoid twisting it. The clip is certainly able to handle any normal shirt pocket. The converter screws in and stays tight. The threads holding all the various joints together are sound. The plating shows no defect, but should not be aggressively polished.

Overall, this pen is great if you’re looking for classic chasing without the worry of black hard rubber and with a modern nib feel. Be sure to test it before getting it, to ensure the feed and nib write well. Mine did not and I had to work on it.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v516/SirMike1983/IMG_2717.jpg

What to look for:
-the pen should come with its converter, box and papers. NOTE: the converter screws in, it is not a “press fit”. It is quite helpful to have the original converter. The converter should not leak or stick.
-the nib should be straight and free of any bends, dents or other defects. Be sure to check the crescent-shaped breather hole for hairline cracks around the edges. This is a sign of an abused nib.
-the clip should be straight and the snap of it crisp
-the feed should be properly formed, allowing a moderate flow and consistent writing
-the nib should have a spherical tip and be free of defect that prevents the ink from contacting the paper (sometimes called “baby’s bottom”)
-all threads should make good contact and synch up tight