Page 1 of 49 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 962

Thread: Definition of Christian

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    125
    Thanks
    107
    Thanked 50 Times in 28 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Definition of Christian

    I was raised a Catholic but I haven't been to a church in a long while. As I read and learn, I started to question and I no longer believe in divinity of Jesus. I still believe in God. What does that make me?

  2. #2
    Senior Member jar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Deep South Texas
    Posts
    4,045
    Thanks
    479
    Thanked 3,712 Times in 1,610 Posts
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: Definition of Christian

    Actually I have had a thread that's so far been running for twelve years on "What is Christianity." and so far no one answer has emerged. Instead what has been presented has been quite a few different definition with many claiming to be the "True Christianity¸™".

    What ever it is, it's pretty clear that Jesus if Jesus actually existed was not a Christian but rather a nice Jewish boy.

    As a cradle Creedal Christian I find the subject fascinating and the assumptions simply mindblowing. An example is the assumption that there is such a thing as "The Bible™" when in fact there are a whole host of different Canons, the shortest including only the first five books of the Old Testament, the Torah, and excluding the rest of the Tanakh and all of the New Testament. Their reasoning (and it seems valid) is that as Christians the basis should be those books canonized while Jesus lived. Another of the oldest Christian traditions and churches actually has two Canons, a long and short Canon with the long canon including over 80 books.

    A second common but amazing belief seems to be that "The Bible™" is only one book and not an anthology of anthologies written by mostly unknown authors over uncounted periods of time edited by unknown editors and still later redacted and translated and edited yet again, often for social and political reasons instead of theological ones.

    After all, the various creeds were also trying to define Christianity which may explain why we have so many different creeds.

  3. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to jar For This Useful Post:

    ethernautrix (April 14th, 2016), fountainpenkid (August 31st, 2016), Marsilius (April 15th, 2016), welch (March 3rd, 2023)

  4. #3
    Member checkrail's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Dumfriesshire, Scotland, Great Britain.
    Posts
    66
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 99 Times in 24 Posts
    Rep Power
    11

    Default Re: Definition of Christian

    There are some simplicities in fields of complexity. In the doctrines of all the major branches of Christianity for all their dfferences, Roman Catholicism, Orthodoxy, Episcopalianism and (in most larger denominations) Protestantism all share the belief that God is a Trinity of three Persons, Father, Son and Holy Spirit/Ghost and that Jesus is the second Person incarnated and therefore divine. One can obviously assent or dissent: that is the belief of the bodies to which the vast majority of Christians belong.

  5. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to checkrail For This Useful Post:

    Brisboy (August 31st, 2016), Judybug (April 14th, 2016), Mags (June 17th, 2016), VertOlive (April 11th, 2016)

  6. #4
    Senior Member jar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Deep South Texas
    Posts
    4,045
    Thanks
    479
    Thanked 3,712 Times in 1,610 Posts
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: Definition of Christian

    Quote Originally Posted by checkrail View Post
    There are some simplicities in fields of complexity. In the doctrines of all the major branches of Christianity for all their dfferences, Roman Catholicism, Orthodoxy, Episcopalianism and (in most larger denominations) Protestantism all share the belief that God is a Trinity of three Persons, Father, Son and Holy Spirit/Ghost and that Jesus is the second Person incarnated and therefore divine. One can obviously assent or dissent: that is the belief of the bodies to which the vast majority of Christians belong.
    That is one way to box Christianity; into two groups, the Trinitarians and Non-Trinitarians and so a possible definition might be Christians believe in a divine (kinda because even there there are further differing definitions) and can be Trinitarians or Non-Trinitarians.

  7. #5
    Member checkrail's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Dumfriesshire, Scotland, Great Britain.
    Posts
    66
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 99 Times in 24 Posts
    Rep Power
    11

    Default Re: Definition of Christian

    That is not exactly what I was meant. In terms of their professed doctrine those bodies believe that a Trinitarian belief and belief in the divinity of Jesus are essential characteristics of Christianity.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to checkrail For This Useful Post:

    VertOlive (April 11th, 2016)

  9. #6
    Senior Member jar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Deep South Texas
    Posts
    4,045
    Thanks
    479
    Thanked 3,712 Times in 1,610 Posts
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: Definition of Christian

    Quote Originally Posted by checkrail View Post
    That is not exactly what I was meant. In terms of their professed doctrine those bodies believe that a Trinitarian belief and belief in the divinity of Jesus are essential characteristics of Christianity.
    But there are non-Trinitarians who also believe that the Trinitarians have it wrong.

    What makes one group correct?

  10. #7
    Member checkrail's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Dumfriesshire, Scotland, Great Britain.
    Posts
    66
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 99 Times in 24 Posts
    Rep Power
    11

    Default Re: Definition of Christian

    Quote Originally Posted by jar View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by checkrail View Post
    That is not exactly what I was meant. In terms of their professed doctrine those bodies believe that a Trinitarian belief and belief in the divinity of Jesus are essential characteristics of Christianity.
    But there are non-Trinitarians who also believe that the Trinitarians have it wrong.

    What makes one group correct?
    Most theologians and believers have looked at the Christian message and have located themselves in Trinitarian bodies which gives that doctrine a certain authority. It is obviously a matter for one's own judgment whether that kind of majoritarian argument carrries weight.
    What is quite certain is that Jesus cannot be the Son of God and not Son of God; the Trinitarian and non-Trinitarian views cannot both valid. But as to who decides who is correct, I reckon the individual has to decide for him-/herself based on his/her evaluation of the evidence.

    To the OP:
    Sorry. I have not directly addressed your question previously. If your belief in God remains inspired by the life of Christ but with divinity abstracted, then broadly Unitarian would possibly be the answer.
    Last edited by checkrail; March 19th, 2016 at 05:38 AM.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to checkrail For This Useful Post:

    VertOlive (April 11th, 2016)

  12. #8
    Senior Member jar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Deep South Texas
    Posts
    4,045
    Thanks
    479
    Thanked 3,712 Times in 1,610 Posts
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: Definition of Christian

    Quote Originally Posted by checkrail View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by jar View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by checkrail View Post
    That is not exactly what I was meant. In terms of their professed doctrine those bodies believe that a Trinitarian belief and belief in the divinity of Jesus are essential characteristics of Christianity.
    But there are non-Trinitarians who also believe that the Trinitarians have it wrong.

    What makes one group correct?
    Most theologians and believers have looked at the Christian message and have located themselves in Trinitarian bodies which gives that doctrine a certain authority. It is obviously a matter for one's own judgment whether that kind of majoritarian argument carrries weight.
    What is quite certain is that Jesus cannot be the Son of God and not Son of God; the Trinitarian and non-Trinitarian views cannot both valid. But as to who decides who is correct, I reckon the individual has to decide for him-/herself based on his/her evaluation of the evidence.

    To the OP:
    Sorry. I have not directly addressed your question previously. If your belief in God remains inspired by the life of Christ but with divinity abstracted, then broadly Unitarian would possibly be the answer.
    Understanding of the Trinity can take many forms.

    For example, the Apostles Creed does not require Jesus to be divine, only the Son of God which was a term often applied to humans.

    There is also the position that Jesus was fully and only human while alive and living among us but became divine with the ascension.

    Personally, I believe if Jesus was not simply human while alive and on earth then I think the message of resurrection and a life after death is greatly diminished.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to jar For This Useful Post:

    ethernautrix (April 14th, 2016)

  14. #9
    Member checkrail's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Dumfriesshire, Scotland, Great Britain.
    Posts
    66
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 99 Times in 24 Posts
    Rep Power
    11

    Default Re: Definition of Christian

    Quote Originally Posted by jar View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by checkrail View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by jar View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by checkrail View Post
    That is not exactly what I was meant. In terms of their professed doctrine those bodies believe that a Trinitarian belief and belief in the divinity of Jesus are essential characteristics of Christianity.
    But there are non-Trinitarians who also believe that the Trinitarians have it wrong.

    What makes one group correct?
    Most theologians and believers have looked at the Christian message and have located themselves in Trinitarian bodies which gives that doctrine a certain authority. It is obviously a matter for one's own judgment whether that kind of majoritarian argument carrries weight.
    What is quite certain is that Jesus cannot be the Son of God and not Son of God; the Trinitarian and non-Trinitarian views cannot both valid. But as to who decides who is correct, I reckon the individual has to decide for him-/herself based on his/her evaluation of the evidence.

    To the OP:
    Sorry. I have not directly addressed your question previously. If your belief in God remains inspired by the life of Christ but with divinity abstracted, then broadly Unitarian would possibly be the answer.
    Understanding of the Trinity can take many forms.

    For example, the Apostles Creed does not require Jesus to be divine, only the Son of God which was a term often applied to humans.

    There is also the position that Jesus was fully and only human while alive and living among us but became divine with the ascension.

    Personally, I believe if Jesus was not simply human while alive and on earth then I think the message of resurrection and a life after death is greatly diminished.
    Thank you for underlining my view that we each take our own decision on such things.

  15. #10
    Senior Member jar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Deep South Texas
    Posts
    4,045
    Thanks
    479
    Thanked 3,712 Times in 1,610 Posts
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: Definition of Christian

    Quote Originally Posted by checkrail View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by jar View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by checkrail View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by jar View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by checkrail View Post
    That is not exactly what I was meant. In terms of their professed doctrine those bodies believe that a Trinitarian belief and belief in the divinity of Jesus are essential characteristics of Christianity.
    But there are non-Trinitarians who also believe that the Trinitarians have it wrong.

    What makes one group correct?
    Most theologians and believers have looked at the Christian message and have located themselves in Trinitarian bodies which gives that doctrine a certain authority. It is obviously a matter for one's own judgment whether that kind of majoritarian argument carrries weight.
    What is quite certain is that Jesus cannot be the Son of God and not Son of God; the Trinitarian and non-Trinitarian views cannot both valid. But as to who decides who is correct, I reckon the individual has to decide for him-/herself based on his/her evaluation of the evidence.

    To the OP:
    Sorry. I have not directly addressed your question previously. If your belief in God remains inspired by the life of Christ but with divinity abstracted, then broadly Unitarian would possibly be the answer.
    Understanding of the Trinity can take many forms.

    For example, the Apostles Creed does not require Jesus to be divine, only the Son of God which was a term often applied to humans.

    There is also the position that Jesus was fully and only human while alive and living among us but became divine with the ascension.

    Personally, I believe if Jesus was not simply human while alive and on earth then I think the message of resurrection and a life after death is greatly diminished.
    Thank you for underlining my view that we each take our own decision on such things.
    As I mentioned above, I've had a thread that's been running for over 12 years now and so far that is the only possible conclusion. Other than a belief that Jesus existed and a self identification as a Christian there appears to be no universal definition of what is Christianity.

  16. #11
    Senior Member Flounder's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    374
    Thanks
    285
    Thanked 402 Times in 161 Posts
    Rep Power
    11

    Default Re: Definition of Christian

    Wait wait I think I know this one, it's Arianism isn't it?
    Latest pen related post @ flounders-mindthots.blogspot.com : '70s Pilot Elite pocket pen review

  17. #12
    Senior Member stub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Daegu, Korea
    Posts
    1,066
    Thanks
    224
    Thanked 791 Times in 401 Posts
    Rep Power
    11

    Default Re: Definition of Christian

    Quote Originally Posted by RNHC View Post
    I was raised a Catholic but I haven't been to a church in a long while. As I read and learn, I started to question and I no longer believe in divinity of Jesus. I still believe in God. What does that make me?

    A deist

  18. #13
    Senior Member jar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Deep South Texas
    Posts
    4,045
    Thanks
    479
    Thanked 3,712 Times in 1,610 Posts
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: Definition of Christian

    Quote Originally Posted by Flounder View Post
    Wait wait I think I know this one, it's Arianism isn't it?
    There are other possibilities.

    One involves the term "incarnate" which carries a meaning beyond simply sharing or appearing as but rather becoming fully and completely.

    In this version of Christianity the Sacrifice is not Jesus death (after all his death was not unusual, in fact two others died the same way the same day at the same location) but rather God becoming just man, the creator of all that is reduced to an infant, unable to focus his eyes, feed himself, control his bowels, talk, understand, walk or even crawl. It is God becoming man to experience what being man is, to teach, to show by example, to live and to eventually die. In this version Jesus while on the Earth is fully and completely human.

    Before Jesus birth and after the ascension Jesus may well be divine and in this version of Christianity members believe that before birth and after ascension Jesus is divine.

    This version does not make God look as utterly stupid as the blood sacrifice version.

  19. #14
    Senior Member Morgaine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,073
    Thanks
    635
    Thanked 386 Times in 254 Posts
    Rep Power
    12

    Default Re: Definition of Christian

    I wonder if some people are a little disillusioned with The Bible. I ran into an argument elsewhere about Deuteronomy and someone seemed to defend things in it saying it was the civil law of the land. Some verses seem to have barbaric punishments/consequences (You must purge the evil from among you - seems to apply to sex before marriage, adultery, worshippers of other gods), yet if these were carried out in this day and age... you'd end up in prison. Perhaps The Bible should be revised for this period in time.

    There was a "prank" video I think in The Netherlands (might have been Denmark) - the comedians wrapped up a Bible in a Qu'ran cover and went round reading it out to people, some of the more questionable in this day and age parts. Some were utterly shocked at the end on finding out it was the Bible and not the Qu'ran.

  20. #15
    Senior Member dneal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    6,001
    Thanks
    2,403
    Thanked 2,281 Times in 1,306 Posts
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: Definition of Christian

    Quote Originally Posted by RNHC View Post
    I was raised a Catholic but I haven't been to a church in a long while. As I read and learn, I started to question and I no longer believe in divinity of Jesus. I still believe in God. What does that make me?
    A Unitarian (in the original sense of the term, before Unitarian Universalism and other digressions).

  21. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    3,118
    Thanks
    874
    Thanked 2,528 Times in 1,299 Posts
    Rep Power
    13

    Default Re: Definition of Christian

    Whence comes this desire for labelling?

  22. #17
    Senior Member dneal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    6,001
    Thanks
    2,403
    Thanked 2,281 Times in 1,306 Posts
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: Definition of Christian

    Quote Originally Posted by Empty_of_Clouds View Post
    Whence comes this desire for labelling?
    Human nature.

  23. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    3,118
    Thanks
    874
    Thanked 2,528 Times in 1,299 Posts
    Rep Power
    13

    Default Re: Definition of Christian

    Perhaps, but in this kind of conversation what purpose is served by creating such definitions?

  24. #19
    Senior Member dneal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    6,001
    Thanks
    2,403
    Thanked 2,281 Times in 1,306 Posts
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: Definition of Christian

    Quote Originally Posted by Empty_of_Clouds View Post
    Perhaps, but in this kind of conversation what purpose is served by creating such definitions?
    The answering of a question posed by the OP.

  25. The Following User Says Thank You to dneal For This Useful Post:

    Marsilius (April 15th, 2016)

  26. #20
    Senior Member jar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Deep South Texas
    Posts
    4,045
    Thanks
    479
    Thanked 3,712 Times in 1,610 Posts
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: Definition of Christian

    Quote Originally Posted by Empty_of_Clouds View Post
    Whence comes this desire for labelling?
    Humans by nature label things. In the beginning it was us and them, good to eat/not good to eat, something I eat/something that eats me.

    The there was this/not this and man learned that there were many things that were not this yet each was different from the other not thises.

    It really is that simple.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •