Last edited by Chemyst; March 1st, 2016 at 03:02 AM.
datainadequate (August 27th, 2016), Hawk (August 30th, 2016), inky (May 13th, 2013), jacksterp (May 2nd, 2013), KKay (March 1st, 2016), KrazyIvan (April 30th, 2013), Marsilius (May 4th, 2013), naimitsu (March 1st, 2016), oldstoat (May 13th, 2013), penultress (August 31st, 2016), penwash (August 27th, 2016)
That's very useful - thanks.
I've read some posts where I think people mistake precipitates in a highly saturated ink for unwanted particulates. Diluting the ink, then testing as above would differentiate these two possibilities.
... Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working [Pablo Picasso] ...
Very very interesting
Awesome. Off to get my laser pointer
As I read this, I couldn't help but wonder what a centrifuge would do. I have an ancient centrifuge in my classroom.
distracted_mom (March 1st, 2016)
This is really neat. Thanks!
Image restored. Thanks to everyone who emailed to let me know the link was broken!
Very informative! Thank you for sharing, Chemyst!
I think I may be adding the laser pointer test to my ink sampling routine
Can I assume that all inks labelled as 'pigment based inks' would show particulates?
I previously missed this old thread so a delayed 'thank you' for the interesting information.
Am I correct in assuming that dye-based inks with added glittery bits would be classified as the less desirable heterogeneous solution?
I'm happy a few people commented on this thread to bring it back to the forefront. This thread should be fixed to this thread since new members will gain knowledge from the information. After all not everyone is a chemist. Thanks again for the information.
We have met the enemy and he is us.
-Pogo
Bookmarks