Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 81 to 86 of 86

Thread: "break in" period? Is it just me?

  1. #81
    Senior Member Fermata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    488
    Thanks
    187
    Thanked 598 Times in 298 Posts
    Rep Power
    8

    Default Re: "break in" period? Is it just me?

    Quote Originally Posted by DumDum View Post
    In me youth I used to ignore canards. Now, with years galloping by, I realise I've just been ducking the issue all along.
    In the days when Rolls Royce cars were big, heavy and ultra slow there was a joke that Rolls Royce had introduced a new model called the Rolls Royce Canard.

    Because it canardly go up a hill.

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Fermata For This Useful Post:

    azkid (January 14th, 2020), Deb (January 14th, 2020), Jon Szanto (January 14th, 2020)

  3. #82
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Location
    US
    Posts
    6,788
    Thanks
    642
    Thanked 897 Times in 689 Posts
    Rep Power
    11

    Default Re: "break in" period? Is it just me?

    Quote Originally Posted by silverlifter View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck Naill View Post
    There was a thread on another forum in which there appeared to be some agreement that nib/pen tend to take on the writing of the user.
    This is an oft repeated canard. The simplest way to torpedo it is to pick up a vintage pen. The only trace of the previous owner will either be their name/initials engraved on the barrel or their teethmarks on the finial. The nib, unless it has been abused, will bear no indication of whether they wrote cursive, block capitals, left or right (assuming it is not an oblique that they purchased for that reason). And, if it is a quality pen, it will be the same when you pass it on to the next owner.
    After thinking about this posted opinion more, it occurred to me that when we write with a vintage nib, as I do with the several Esterbrook restorations, I would not definitively say with any smidgeon of evidence that I am not experiencing the writing habits of the previous owner, if any previous owner beyond obvious damage.

  4. #83
    FPG Donor ♕ Chrissy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,400
    Thanks
    6,872
    Thanked 10,361 Times in 3,977 Posts
    Rep Power
    24

    Default Re: "break in" period? Is it just me?

    Quote Originally Posted by Fermata View Post

    In the days when Rolls Royce cars were big, heavy and ultra slow there was a joke that Rolls Royce had introduced a new model called the Rolls Royce Canard.

    Because it canardly go up a hill.
    LOL that's a good saying. Judge Judy regularly comes up with the saying: If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a duck. I love it.
    Last edited by Chrissy; January 14th, 2020 at 11:18 PM.
    Regards, Chrissy | My Review Blog: inkyfountainpens

  5. #84
    Senior Member Deb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Highlands of Scotland
    Posts
    1,747
    Thanks
    2,347
    Thanked 1,927 Times in 842 Posts
    Rep Power
    12

    Default Re: "break in" period? Is it just me?

    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck Naill View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by silverlifter View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck Naill View Post
    There was a thread on another forum in which there appeared to be some agreement that nib/pen tend to take on the writing of the user.
    This is an oft repeated canard. The simplest way to torpedo it is to pick up a vintage pen. The only trace of the previous owner will either be their name/initials engraved on the barrel or their teethmarks on the finial. The nib, unless it has been abused, will bear no indication of whether they wrote cursive, block capitals, left or right (assuming it is not an oblique that they purchased for that reason). And, if it is a quality pen, it will be the same when you pass it on to the next owner.
    After thinking about this posted opinion more, it occurred to me that when we write with a vintage nib, as I do with the several Esterbrook restorations, I would not definitively say with any smidgeon of evidence that I am not experiencing the writing habits of the previous owner, if any previous owner beyond obvious damage.
    Agreed. It's possible but not common. Some years ago I had a Waterman 12 which was extremely worn, both on the barrel which had lost all its chasing where the owner had held it and on the nib which was worn flat at the angle the owner had used it. This was a pen which had evidently been used daily for work for decades and was absolutely worn out. That's the only pen, out of thousands, that I have seen in that condition. With that pen you would have inherited the original owner's very heavy-handed writing habit. I have seen others that have been slightly flattened, again evidently by years of use. Those nibs are readily returned to their original condition by a few minutes use of an abrasive. What you usually see in pens 80 to 100 years old is that the tipping material retains the original shape and is hardly worn at all. There would be no sense in going to the trouble and expense of adding tipping material to a nib if it wore easily or quickly.
    Regards,
    Deb
    My Blog

  6. #85
    Junior Member snoopy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    14
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 6 Times in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: "break in" period? Is it just me?

    I tend to think that the pen instructs the hand as has been mentioned but there is one pen that seems to defy that assumption and it's the EF nibs on the Platinum President. A group of four of us bought them at the same time and we all - oddly - had the same experience. The pen in my case was thoroughly flushed before use. The nib started out dry and extremely firm. I write with as little pressure as possible and like the nib to do the work, in part due to my intense dislike of feedback (wrong pen and nib you might say!). As a result I got quite a bit of skipping. Used it for a week and changed inks and still had the same issues as did the other three. The seller was happy to send a replacement nib and feed but asked me to persist for a while and see how it progressed. I used it almost solely for a month with many inks and by the end of that period the nib developed a small bit of softness. Now I mean seriously small, but notably not as firm as when I got it, but I would really only have noticed this through pressing slightly on the nib as I didn't (and still don't) note this through normal writing. The other thing was the flow of the ink improved very dramatically by the end of that month. It's now a daily desk pen, used for quick notes and such. It's not a gusher, but it's not as dry as it was to begin with and not as firm. The experience of the others was the same. I just thought it was a little odd and it did feel like the nib had a kind of breaking in period. I guess it could have been very stubborn manufacturing oils still in there, but it felt a little more than that to me.

  7. #86
    Senior Member welch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    1,031
    Thanks
    1,504
    Thanked 510 Times in 344 Posts
    Rep Power
    12

    Default Re: "break in" period? Is it just me?

    I used one of the first Parker 45's, a medium, and used it for six years. I thought it wrote wetter and better every year. I had chipped off the imitation hood being an in-a-hurry teenager, and thought I had pushed the tines slightly apart.

    Most likely, I adjusted my hand to the 45, which was so much more comfortable than the fine-point Sheaffer school pen I had used before.

    Incidentally, I gave my P-45 to a girl I had a crush on (we had gone out a lot, but...). Bought another Parker 45 to start college, and pressed down on the nib to widen the tines. It did not write like my older pen. A guess: all I'd done is mess up the nib.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •