Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Ink capacities of 1950s MBs

  1. #1
    Senior Member guyy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Brooklyn NY
    Posts
    775
    Thanks
    381
    Thanked 618 Times in 344 Posts
    Rep Power
    8

    Default Ink capacities of 1950s MBs

    The capacity of the 1950s 149 is often cited as 2.8-3.0mL, or about 2x the capacity of today’s 149. What about the other models? How does the 146 compare to the current one? What about the 144 or 142?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Posts
    308
    Thanks
    264
    Thanked 424 Times in 204 Posts
    Rep Power
    4

    Default Re: Ink capacities of 1950s MBs

    Quote Originally Posted by guyy View Post
    The capacity of the 1950s 149 is often cited as 2.8-3.0mL, or about 2x the capacity of today’s 149. What about the other models? How does the 146 compare to the current one? What about the 144 or 142?
    Could this be down to the telescopic filler having a greater swept volume?
    Last edited by RobJohnson; July 30th, 2020 at 08:40 AM.

  3. #3
    Senior Member guyy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Brooklyn NY
    Posts
    775
    Thanks
    381
    Thanked 618 Times in 344 Posts
    Rep Power
    8

    Default Re: Ink capacities of 1950s MBs

    Yes, the telescoping piston allows for greater capacity than the single stage pistons MB uses now.

    I get 1.5mL for the 144 which seems like a pretty good amount for a pen of its size. (The Pelikan 400 holds more, but it has a longer & thicker barrel.)

    I’m curious about the 146. Mine doesn’t seem to take much more than the 144 despite a recent recorking.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Pterodactylus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    3,885
    Thanks
    2,412
    Thanked 4,804 Times in 1,697 Posts
    Rep Power
    15

    Default Re: Ink capacities of 1950s MBs

    May I ask you why you are interested in the absolute numbers?

    I love the 50s pens, and the telescopic pistons, but personal I‘m more interested to write with them than measuring the ink capacity

    Honestly at least for me also the modern ones hold more than enough ink for my needs (just for the notes, also a 50s 142 holds quite some ink, I own a 142 and a 144).
    And you have to see it from the other side, as sooner a pen runs out of ink as sooner you can ink it up with another great ink as there are so many of them.

    But ok, interests and preferences are very personal and different.


    Show_response_782 by Ptero Pterodactylus, auf Flickr

    (Montblanc 144 - BB ..... Diamine Blue Lightning)

  5. #5
    Senior Member guyy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Brooklyn NY
    Posts
    775
    Thanks
    381
    Thanked 618 Times in 344 Posts
    Rep Power
    8

    Default Re: Ink capacities of 1950s MBs

    I’m interested in the capacity mostly as a matter of diagnostics. Is everything working as it should?

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    68
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Rep Power
    6

    Default Re: Ink capacities of 1950s MBs

    @guyy I just happen to be cleaning out an MB 146 celluloid. I get about 1-1/3 ml, measured using a 5 ml capacity sample vial marked in 1 ml increments.
    Last edited by Stylo; August 8th, 2020 at 10:16 AM.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Stylo For This Useful Post:

    guyy (August 8th, 2020)

  8. #7
    Senior Member guyy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Brooklyn NY
    Posts
    775
    Thanks
    381
    Thanked 618 Times in 344 Posts
    Rep Power
    8

    Default Re: Ink capacities of 1950s MBs

    Thanks! I measured by weight and got 26.2g dry & 26.6g full. That works out to 1.4mL, which is just about what you got.

  9. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    68
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Rep Power
    6

    Default Re: Ink capacities of 1950s MBs

    Quote Originally Posted by guyy View Post
    Thanks! I measured by weight and got 26.2g dry & 26.6g full. That works out to 1.4mL, which is just about what you got.
    You're welcome. Nice to know what I got was within range. By the way, regarding the 1.5ml ink volume capacity for a 1950's MB 144 that you got, did you happen to get that by weight as well? Thanks.

  10. #9
    Senior Member guyy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Brooklyn NY
    Posts
    775
    Thanks
    381
    Thanked 618 Times in 344 Posts
    Rep Power
    8

    Default Re: Ink capacities of 1950s MBs

    Whoops that should have been 27.6g full.

    Yes, that 144 measurement was by weight. I just checked again and got 23.4g dry and 24.9g full, so 1.5mL. Both the 144 & 146 are early versions, c. 1950.

    Just for comparison, a 1990s 146 measures 29.6g empty and 31.1g full, so also 1.5mL.

  11. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    68
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Rep Power
    6

    Default Re: Ink capacities of 1950s MBs

    Interesting comparison. It's impressive then that despite its much smaller size a 146 celluloid has the same ink volume as a more recent version.


    Quote Originally Posted by guyy View Post
    Whoops that should have been 27.6g full.

    Yes, that 144 measurement was by weight. I just checked again and got 23.4g dry and 24.9g full, so 1.5mL. Both the 144 & 146 are early versions, c. 1950.

    Just for comparison, a 1990s 146 measures 29.6g empty and 31.1g full, so also 1.5mL.

  12. #11
    Senior Member guyy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Brooklyn NY
    Posts
    775
    Thanks
    381
    Thanked 618 Times in 344 Posts
    Rep Power
    8

    Default Re: Ink capacities of 1950s MBs

    Since the 1950s 149s are a known quantity this is a bit off topic for this thread, but the capacities of other vintages of the 149 are not as widely known — or at least not in anglophone pendom. Here’s what i get:

    1960s
    (groove faced feed, friction fit piston)

    full: 27.5g
    dry: 25.5g

    capacity: 2.0mL

    1970s
    (flat feed, 18c tricolor nib, plastic piston threads)

    full: 30.7g
    dry: 28.7g

    capacity: 2.0mL

    1980s
    (14c bicolor nib, split ebonite feed, plastic piston threads)

    full: 32.7g
    dry: 30.4g

    capacity: 2.3mL

  13. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to guyy For This Useful Post:

    Ahriman4891 (August 10th, 2020), Stylo (August 11th, 2020)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •