Originally Posted by
Chuck Naill
Don't rush to agree since the owner of the truism perhaps is attempting to justify his expensive deciisions. Make him prove his point.
For example is the Lamy 2000 a better pen that the Safari and why. Some might say it looks better. While that's all well and good, looking better does not render a better writtng tool.
These are weak assertions. A person may choose to focus on function
uber alles if one wants to, and I'll be of good social grace and not make fun of that stance. But anyone who judges an object on one element and one element only has already lost the game. It's as if "hey, it has 4 wheels, and an engine and a steering wheel, why would you want anything that looks nice or that you enjoy driving around in? Isn't the point just to get in, get there and nothing else?"
These are absurd arguments. A fountain pen, like so many other objects in our lives, can occupy many places in our interest.
Lastly, as to the Lamy example: you ask which is a better pen, and you suggest the 2K looks better. If one assumes that the pen writes at
least as well as the Safari, then you've just lost the argument: they both function well as writing instruments, and one looks better. And holds more ink. And doesn't have a kindergarten tripod grip. Etc. Etc.
Which is why I made no specific examples - they are too easy to make. There is nothing at all to justify. Nothing.
Bookmarks