Originally Posted by
TSherbs
Originally Posted by
Chuck Naill
There were other reasons to think Trump and his father were racist. It is a matter of history and not my personal bias. He's said and done plently for those that would look.
Yes, I have pointed these out on other threads (going back long before the big orange racist baby ran for president.) The feds, for example, charged both men in the 1970s with racially discriminatory business practices. The central Park five affair was in late 80s-early 90s. The birther bullshit came in 2008, but simply continued the pattern of racism and race-baiting
Whatever.
Sent from my moto g power using Tapatalk
dneal, this was in response to your erroneous claim that accusations of Trump's racism came
after he ran for president. You did not specify which time he ran for president, but you are wrong no matter which presidential contest Trump ran in: the accusations of racism and racist practice go back long before he ran for president.
Why should Chuck or anyone else engage with you when you are wrong, you make claims regardless of the truth (and couch them in terms that make you *sound* like you know what you are talking about), and then you denigrate a poster for actually responding to your request for engagement?
You even made the racist argument of noting that Trump's alleged racism is controverted by the fact that he held an Oval Office ceremony honoring legislation for HBCUs. You do not even understand that that kind of "evidence" does nothing to controvert the charge that he has been racist *at other times.* Misogynists can be married to women and have daughters and still practice misogyny.
That Jefferson fathered children via Sally Hemmings (a slave) does not mean that Jefferson was not an evil, racist slave holder. It most likely means that he was a racist slave holder and a rapist, actually.
Criminals cannot escape the charge of criminality simply because they spend some of their days committing no crimes.
And, by the way, it is not an *anger* management issue to call someone a dick. I just can't find more fitting language for the behavior that you repeat on these back threads. You strike me as addicted to conflict and debate, since you denigrate any conversations that do not fit this style. You call me angry because I use vulgar language, but in that you are mistaken: I just don't think that your behavior back here deserves better. You troll for conflict under the guise of "discussion," but then you denigrate the one or two persons who have the gumption to actually answer your posts with your jaw sticking out in challenge and your faux-humility about your own self-education.
Bookmarks