Originally Posted by
724Seney
Originally Posted by
Chuck Naill
I don't see this as a balanced reply. I've never read or heard anyone saying Trump didn't win. They were shocked that such a person, with a history of failed business ventures and preditory behavior toward miniorities and females could win the election. Of course, I do not know who you consider mainstream media which has become a undefined cliche.
Social media finally understood that their holdings could result in insurrection, distruction, and sadly, death. There is the concept of "greater good" that business ethics demands.
The word "balance" was utilized to convey that there was more to the anger of > 75 million Americans than just the voting process, itself. Many have accepted that as fair and legitimate yet are still angry with what has transpired.
As for the application of the word "ethics" to the main social media applications (and their respective leadership)............seriously?????
I do not intuitivily understand your context unless you explain nor do I know that 75 million Americans are any more angry or concerned that those who voted for Clinton in 2016. Not that you implied that comparisen.
Ethics and dogma are liquid as more information comes forward. Do you think the same as you did at 20 years old? People "shit" in the Capital. A person was beaten to death in the capital with a fire extinguisher. If you own a company that allowed the radicalization and carrying out of the exercise of this behavior, yes, a change of focus and philosophy must take place. And, remember, corporations are made up of people just like me and you.
Bookmarks