Vaccine mandate ethical dilemma

[Chuck Naill]

My own advice? I think you misread my post.

I don't take advice from folks who profited greatly pushing overpriced drugs for big pharma. At least I know now why you hate the ivermectin topic so much though, it's not profitable now that it's out of patent. Explains a lot, and makes one wonder what investments are paying for Chuck's retirement. Merck? Pfizer?

Is this the invective you prefer, Chuck?

p.s.: folks that put me on their ignore list are actually doing me a favor.

You shouldn't take your advice from me. I once had a neonatal specialist say my antibiotic saved a baby's life. That's all I need. I need nothing from a vet hiding behind the flag.

That said, if people are ignoring you, its a statement of something.

[dneal]

Oh, I don't take any advice from you.

The people who ignore me (although they don't, really, as we both know) are usually those who become enraged that their hyperbolic rhetoric isn't persuasive; or those - like you - who like to trot out personal attacks in an admittance that their argument failed.

I'd comment on the "vet" thing, but you already let us know how you don't like hearing about my Army experience. Curious how often you manage to bring it up, though. I don't really think anything of it, because my sense of self-worth isn't dictated by it; but I notice that those like yourself usually arrive at your animosity from some sense of self-loathing. Jealousy? Self-conscience and guilt getting the best of you? Who knows...

I'm happy to crank up the vitriol if that's what you prefer. We both know you can't trigger me, but I can reduce you to a babbling, incoherent mess. You can dish it out, but you can't take it.

Choice is yours, Chuck (or the "other" Chuck, which is who seems to be on your computer today). Reasonable discussion or name-calling? I'd recommend you "ignore" me, but we both know you'll peek. You can't help yourself.

[Chuck Naill]

Oh, I don't take any advice from you.

The people who ignore me (although they don't, really, as we both know) are usually those who become enraged that their hyperbolic rhetoric isn't persuasive; or those - like you - who like to trot out personal attacks in an admittance that their argument failed.

I'd comment on the "vet" thing, but you already let us know how you don't like hearing about my Army experience. Curious how often you manage to bring it up, though. I don't really think anything of it, because my sense of self-worth isn't dictated by it; but I notice that those like yourself usually arrive at your animosity from some sense of self-loathing. Jealousy? Self-conscience and guilt getting the best of you? Who knows...

I'm happy to crank up the vitriol if that's what you prefer. We both know you can't trigger me, but I can reduce you to a babbling, incoherent mess. You can dish it out, but you can't take it.

Choice is yours, Chuck (or the "other" Chuck, which is who seems to be on your computer today). Reasonable discussion or name-calling? I'd recommend you "ignore" me, but we both know you'll peek. You can't help yourself.

You do a dis-service to veterans.

Everyone has to vet your sources and quotes due to lying and context.

[dneal]

You're really grasping now. Try again.

[Chuck Naill]

I'm your best way out of stupid, @denial. Sorry, misspelled.

[dneal]

Hmmm...

Point out the Freudian slip? Nah, typos and auto-correct happens.

Go with "stupid", and remark on expertise or experience? How about asking about the journey "out of stupid", since it seems to be still ongoing? Nah...

Yeah Chuck, you're going to have to try again. That one is too easy.

[Chuck Naill]

Keep trying to keep up...lOl!!

[dneal]

Yes, we know you keep trying to keep up, Chuck.

p.s.: you forgot the emoticon.

[Chuck Naill]

Yes, we know you keep trying to keep up, Chuck.

p.s.: you forgot the emoticon.

Who is "we" white man?

[kazoolaw]

Yes, we know you keep trying to keep up, Chuck.

p.s.: you forgot the emoticon.

Who is "we" white man?

Now with the racism: well done Chuck.

[Chuck Naill]

Yes, we know you keep trying to keep up, Chuck.

p.s.: you forgot the emoticon.

Who is "we" white man?

Now with the racism: well done Chuck.

Probably before your time joke.

[kazoolaw]

No, you blew the punch line, Kemosabe.

[Chuck Naill]

No, you blew the punch line, Kemosabe.

Okay, whatever.

[ethernautrix]

Things that make you go "hmmm...."

[ethernautrix]

And this...

[ethernautrix]

And then there's this:

PFIZER IS LOBBYING TO THWART WHISTLEBLOWERS FROM EXPOSING CORPORATE FRAUD
Pfizer is among the Big Pharma companies trying to block legislation strengthening whistleblowers’ ability to report corporate fraud.


https://theintercept.com/2021/11/29/...rporate-fraud/

I don't know the political bias of The Intercept. As far as I know, this is the first I've heard of it (the lawsuit via Russell Brand).

Echoing what I've heard about privacy, if you don't have anything to hide, why "thwart whistleblowers from exposing corporate fraud?"










An article on the subject from Forbes: https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikake...ne-makers/amp/


And perhaps a counterpoint: https://www.medpagetoday.com/special...clusives/95484

[dneal]

Standing by for the "Russell Brand?!?!?! ho ho, haha" dismissal and the "conspiracy theorist" accusations...

[Chip]

Don't hold your breath.

[Chuck Naill]

The pharma industry is one of those businesses that you can't live with them or without them.

[Chip]

Standing by for the "Russell Brand?!?!?! ho ho, haha" dismissal and the "conspiracy theorist" accusations...

What's the phrase? Swivel-eyed Loon?

Anyhow, this is lots more fun.