I Guess it's Time to Discuss January 6th

[724Seney]

@calamus:
You're on a roll man!!
Keep 'em coming!!!

[Chuck Naill]

Oh great, we have another member posting memes and vidoes. 😂

[TSherbs]

Well, this won't go down well for him at his sentencing: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/vitali-...troom-hearing/

[dneal]

Hopefully he didn’t have one of those deadly flagpoles violent insurrectionists are known to conceal on their person.

[Chuck Naill]

https://twitter.com/i/status/1417573129849815047

[dneal]

https://x.com/julie_kelly2/status/16...434163712?s=61

[kazoolaw]

https://x.com/julie_kelly2/status/16...434163712?s=61

CN-
Please compare/contrast this with the injury sustained by Ashli Babbitt.
In your words, if possible.

[Chuck Naill]

https://x.com/julie_kelly2/status/16...434163712?s=61

CN-
Please compare/contrast this with the injury sustained by Ashli Babbitt.
In your words, if possible.

Did she work of the Capital Police? Just kidding. Have you read the officer who shot her and why? Of course you haven't. Sorry I asked.

[kazoolaw]

It was not a joke then, nor is a joke today. Is there no depth that you will not stoop to?
I saw the shooting the day it occurred,and am still waiting for him to be cross-examined.

[Chuck Naill]

It was not a joke then, nor is a joke today. Is there no depth that you will not stoop to?
I saw the shooting the day it occurred,and am still waiting for him to be cross-examined.

Really Kaz?? Your posts are usually missing crucial information, which I figure is an attempt to be cute. Was it a joke last week or a month ago? Are you a Christian, or a troll. How about making some deposits so we know. For someone who wants accurate posts, you leave much to be desired, but I know that's the intent.

She, like others, were misled. Had you done some homework on previously convicted people, you would already be aware. They were misled by Trump. How much do you know about her? Her blood is on Trump and no one else. So, grow a couple and confront neal and seny for a change.

What was her business? She cleaned pools.

[dneal]

Really Chuck?

They had flagpoles.

You don't stage an "insurrection" to take over a global superpower with flagpoles.

[kazoolaw]

Yes, really Chuck.
She was “misled?” That’s why she was shot, because she was misled?
Or are you just “kidding?”

[dneal]

I was just watching an officer testify in the Colorado ballot trial.

He claims to have sustained injuries, being hit with his own riot baton as a more severe example. I'll not contest it for the moment. He was dressed in riot gear and faced a riotous mob, and there was violence.

I'll likely not even quibble that Trump incited a riot. Were he to have been charged and convicted with that, I'd probably lean to "yeah, I can see it".

Leftists can't help themselves. They love imagery and pageantry (this is their religion, after all). They swoon at the tales of the martyrs as they follow along with the great narratives spun by their preferred town criers. These are the everything's "literally Hitler" people, after all.

It was the most savage insurrectionalistic threat to the virginity of the holy democracy since Cain killed Abel.

And they repeat it with a straight face.

Here we have 50 pages of one of them documenting the insanity.

[calamus]

Donald Trump never incited a riot. Antifa provocateurs did. The whole insurrection narrative and the January 6 trials are a dog and pony show and kangaroo court rolled into one.

[dneal]

Donald Trump never incited a riot. Antifa provocateurs did. The whole insurrection narrative and the January 6 trials are a dog and pony show and kangaroo court rolled into one.

You’ve missed the larger point quibbling a smaller one.

[Chuck Naill]

We were all present on January 6, 2021. We know about the Trump speech and its content. We know about the woman killed and why. We know about the weapons used. We heard the defendant testimonies where they thought they were following Trump's lead. We know it wasn't a walk in the park. We know the injuries inflicted on the Capital Police. What has occurred and with glaring evidence presented here, is an attempt to rewrite what actually happened. I've noticed it gradually evolve from what it was into something different. There must be someone influencing the three members here to asked about the female killed for trying to enter a window near where the politicians were meeting as if she was not doing what the video clearly depicted.

Later we learned of Trump's activities on January 6, 2021 by multiple testimonies. We know what he said when he was pressured to call off the insurrectionists. We know they were charged with insurrection and are doing time as a result. We know or knew it was available, testimony of those inside the White House. We know Trump's circle of co-conspirators and what they did to overturn the votes of our fellow Americans.

It is either a mental sickness or illusion to speak of this as not what it was, but my concern is that what we are reading here is a radicalization of Americans who decide that if you don't like the history, change the narrative into something you prefer.

[dneal]

It is either a mental sickness or illusion to speak of this as not what it was, but my concern is that what we are reading here is a radicalization of Americans who decide that if you don't like the history, change the narrative into something you prefer.

Anyone who asserts a riot on Jan 6 was an "insurrection" is editing history in real time, to comport with a narrative. The scale of the TDS, to include the judiciary as evidenced by their statements, is astounding.

You don't stage a successful coup with flagpoles.

[TSherbs]

The whole insurrection narrative and the January 6 trials are a dog and pony show and kangaroo court rolled into one.

What's your explanation for the grand juries and judges who disagree with you?

[724Seney]

The whole insurrection narrative and the January 6 trials are a dog and pony show and kangaroo court rolled into one.

What's your explanation for the grand juries and judges who disagree with you?

1. Weaponization of the judicial system
2. The use of politics as a poorly disguised means of retaliation.

[dneal]

The whole insurrection narrative and the January 6 trials are a dog and pony show and kangaroo court rolled into one.

What's your explanation for the grand juries and judges who disagree with you?

1. Weaponization of the judicial system
2. The use of politics as a poorly disguised means of retaliation.

Strangely, they can envision it when the lens colors are different. It’s what they swore would happen under Trump.