I Guess it's Time to Discuss January 6th

[dneal]

Somebody got triggered.

[Chuck Naill]

Somebody got triggered.

Not at all, just surprised, but also informed more how people allow themselves to believe things they saw with their own eyes and decide it isn't true. I see two groups. One group is comprised of people who know better but post things to get attention and to fit in. The other group actually then believes the nonsense. This allows me to understand that someone took precautions seriously during the pandemic but appear cavalier online. Fitting in can be a very important determinant for how some decide to live, but maybe even more so online. I guess one could call them posers and be correct.

[dneal]

3 random posts at 10:48, 10:49 and 10:52?

Classic "Chuck is triggered".

As for the rest of your post, I agree. Although you have grouped people reasonably, you have likely misattributed which group is which. The group that actually believes the nonsense is the one that drinks the blue kool-aide.

From Russian Collusion to "Insurrection!!", they keep falling for Democrat hoaxes.

The Harvard/Harris poll in the Trump 2024 thread should enlighten you.

[Chuck Naill]

Since I am not huddled behind my desk, I use an iPhone to reply. Since no edits can be accomplished, maybe you can now understand. Your ability to reason, except to disparage is noted.

The people who drink or drank the kool aid showed up in January 6.

How would you define sans conspiracies, what occurred on January 6 taking into account what defendants have said regarding Trumps speech and subsequent activities. I realize that this might rip off your mask, so deflecting is understandable.

[dneal]

I've been retired for years now. The desk thing was stupid when Chip introduced it. You trying to do something with it is just as ridiculous.

There is an abundance of novel events and circumstantial evidence around the 2020 election. Questioning an election is not a new thing, nor are challenges.

People protested, parliamentary procedure was conducted, Biden has been the President for over half his term now.

Some of the protest was violent and riotous. How that came to be is questionable, particularly in light of video being released - and why that video was not included in the Jan 6 hearings. We only heard the prosecution's case, we now see.

"Insurrection" is a term used by people so partisan they have lost some grasp of reality. Code pink morons wailing and chaining themselves to things and whatnot.

Ironically, they're going to get you more Trump. You should look at the Harvard/Harris poll. It's hardly some GOP propaganda.

It's all your narratives collapsing, in graph form.

[TSherbs]

This dude got some additional time for mouthing of to judge and skipping court:

https://apnews.com/article/capitol-r...8a30b545c78959

[Chuck Naill]

If not “insurrection, is “attack on the Capital” ,appropriate?

[dneal]

Protest. Riot at best.

The other side burned cities and that was called "mostly peaceful".

[TSherbs]

The article doesn't say so, but I'm guessing that the jury did not take long to convict this one:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/jus...lty-rcna126236

[Chuck Naill]

Protest. Riot at best.

The other side burned cities and that was called "mostly peaceful".

It has to be noted that the George Floyd Protests occurred because of what African Americans had been dealing with for a long time. There were over 2000 protests in the US and numerous ones internationally. The very brutality of suffocating a human being in plain view showed a total disregard or respect. Mr. Floyd's death just brought the results of being systematically humiliated to the surface. We see this same result anywhere humiliated people exist. Eventually you get outrage.

January 6 was something else and cannot be compared to BLM protests. The only humiliated person was a person who lost an election who had been humiliating others his entire life.

I see Jan 6 denialism the same as Holocaust denialism. Everyone knows what happened.

[TSherbs]

Ken Buck on his party "lying to America":

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/1...n-lie-00128626

[Chuck Naill]

“Everyone who makes the argument that January 6 was, you know, an unguided tour of the Capitol is lying to America. Everyone who says that the prisoners who are being prosecuted right now for their involvement in January 6, that they are somehow political prisoners or that they didn’t commit crimes, those folks are lying to America.”

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/1...m_medium=email

We've read those lies repeated here by two members on this forum.

[dneal]

Somehow you guys missed this quote from the piece.

But since you agree with everything Ken Buck says...

"... Joe Biden is an existential threat to this country."

[Chuck Naill]

What I agree with is what I posted and how it contradicts what has been implied and then more blatantly said here about the topic.

[dneal]

It doesn't contradict anything. It's a politician saying something. You like it, because you're partisan.

[Chuck Naill]

Nope, it simply agrees with what I saw take place and the transcript of Trump's speech, for which I read. On the other hand, you invented a narrative and now must defend it or lose face. Loosing face would be too high a price to pay.

[dneal]

You, like TSherbs, post partisan headlines and narratives in lieu of cogent arguments and ability to discern reality.

Now you again assign a narrative of what I have said. Feel free to cite the posts that support it.

You could start with this one:

There is an abundance of novel events and circumstantial evidence around the 2020 election. Questioning an election is not a new thing, nor are challenges.

People protested, parliamentary procedure was conducted, Biden has been the President for over half his term now.

Some of the protest was violent and riotous. How that came to be is questionable, particularly in light of video being released - and why that video was not included in the Jan 6 hearings. We only heard the prosecution's case, we now see.

"Insurrection" is a term used by people so partisan they have lost some grasp of reality. Code pink morons wailing and chaining themselves to things and whatnot.

Ironically, they're going to get you more Trump. You should look at the Harvard/Harris poll. It's hardly some GOP propaganda.

It's all your narratives collapsing, in graph form.

[Chuck Naill]

I'm hoping there are enough Americans who will trust their ears and eyes to remember what occurred and who started it. If it is partisan to quote a Republican against Republican conspiracies, I'm okay being partisan.

If we get more Trump, it will be because of those who continue to drink the Kool-Aid. Surely that is a minority of Americans.

[Chuck Naill]

“Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who put darkness for light, and light for darkness; Who put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!”
Isaiah 5:20

[dneal]

I'm hoping there are enough Americans who will trust their ears and eyes to remember what occurred and who started it. If it is partisan to quote a Republican against Republican conspiracies, I'm okay being partisan.

If we get more Trump, it will be because of those who continue to drink the Kool-Aid. Surely that is a minority of Americans.

If you get more Trump, it will be because you TDS sufferers couldn't help yourself.

How's that Letitia James real-estate fraud trial going? TSherbs hasn't posted any updates, for some reason.

Is it because of the evidence of Judge Engoron's clerk supporting Letitia James campaign, and pejorative Trump statements?

Perhaps the Deutsche Bank loan officer's testimony that there was nothing unusual about valuations or approving Trump's loans?

This is why you'll get more Trump. The dog and pony show in Georgia is why you'll get more Trump. The Colorado ballot case is why you'll get more Trump. Jack Smith is why you'll get more Trump.