Does Trumo Really Believe He Lost?

[Chuck Naill]

Just listened to an interview. He mentions the states he lost and suggested there were more votes and voters. Of course this is not true, but he's still pushing it. I don't think he really believe he won.

Thoughts?

[TSherbs]

I have no idea. Either answer should DQ him from leadership of the nation for another term.

[kazoolaw]

Either answer should DQ him from leadership of the nation for another term.

Now do HRC.

[Chuck Naill]

Either answer should DQ him from leadership of the nation for another term.

Now do HRC.

same as
dAR

[terim]

Either answer should DQ him from leadership of the nation for another term.

Now do HRC.

same as
dAR

Daughters of the American Revolution. They gave me a scholarship in high school and I was mortified but I wasn't cool enough to turn it down.

[Chuck Naill]

Either answer should DQ him from leadership of the nation for another term.

Now do HRC.

same as
dAR

Daughters of the American Revolution. They gave me a scholarship in high school and I was mortified but I wasn't cool enough to turn it down.

LOL!! Good for you.

[Chuck Naill]

I figure he just rallies the base and since you noted Republicans hadn’t won the popular vote since 2004, I guess he’s after the minority.

[TSherbs]

Either answer should DQ him from leadership of the nation for another term.

Now do HRC.

What's this mean?

[TSherbs]

Either answer should DQ him from leadership of the nation for another term.

Now do HRC.

same as
dAR

What weird code are you guys talking in?

[Chuck Naill]

Either answer should DQ him from leadership of the nation for another term.

Now do HRC.

same as
dAR

What weird code are you guys talking in?

We know Kaz is a troll. I just play along....LOL!!

[kazoolaw]

Either answer should DQ him from leadership of the nation for another term.

Now do HRC.

same as
dAR

What weird code are you guys talking in?

HRC=Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Hip political jive.
Your turn Chuck, you got me with dAR.

[TSherbs]

Either answer should DQ him from leadership of the nation for another term.

Now do HRC.

same as
dAR

What weird code are you guys talking in?

HRC=Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Hip political jive.
Your turn Chuck, you got me with dAR.

Yes, but what does "do Hilary Rodham Clinton" mean? Could you just be specific and clear, please? Again, I find several of your comments either ironic in tone or simply imprecise to avoid the commitment of a clear statement. You ask questions of others far more often than you make claims yourself. Which is fine, you can post what you want. But I'm not interested in playing some sort of vague or suggestive game.

What is it that you want to state?

[kazoolaw]

TS-
Didn't mean to make you frustrated.
"Now do" ____ is a shorthand way of saying apply the same analysis you used before to this new subject.
Take your comment about Trump, that whether or not he believes he lost the election disqualifies him from office, and apply it to Hillary Rodham Clinton and her tearful reading of her acceptance speech, not believing that she could have/should have lost the election but for that pesky Electoral College, and try and convince people that she's a worthy candidate for president.
Or, same crap runs both ways.

[kazoolaw]

Does the fact that you didn't ask about "dAR" mean you know what that means and, if you do, could you please explain it to me?

[Chuck Naill]

Does the fact that you didn't ask about "dAR" mean you know what that means and, if you do, could you please explain it to me?

I've already explained, "We know Kaz is a troll. I just play along....LOL!!"

[TSherbs]

Does the fact that you didn't ask about "dAR" mean you know what that means and, if you do, could you please explain it to me?

For fuck sake, Kazoo

[kazoolaw]

Does the fact that you didn't ask about "dAR" mean you know what that means and, if you do, could you please explain it to me?

For fuck sake, Kazoo

Whatever do you mean? That you found Chuck's post to be ironic, or imprecise? Or just plain undecipherable and that's fine with you because it's Chuck?

[Chuck Naill]

Does the fact that you didn't ask about "dAR" mean you know what that means and, if you do, could you please explain it to me?

For fuck sake, Kazoo

Whatever do you mean? That you found Chuck's post to be ironic, or imprecise? Or just plain undecipherable and that's fine with you because it's Chuck?

Ted knew what I was doing because I said so in my post.

If I were you, and you are interested in having an exchange, stop the nonsense and say what you mean like when you did when you said " In a word, "Yes", she's unqualified for office". Rather, what you did was try to compare her loss to Trump's which didn't fit because 2.9 more Americans voted for her than Trump, and she lost. He lost the popular vote in both elections. As much as you don't like Clinton, almost 3 million more people pulled the lever for her meaning you are in the minority. There is a lesson there if you are willing to listen unless you think minority rule is better.

Why do you think Trump was trying to get those key states to "find enough votes"? Him, Trump, complaining about the vote is like Tom Brady complaining his team lost the Super Bowl because the referees cheated, and then trying to get the league to overturn the loss.

Who wants something ill gained?

[TSherbs]

Who wants something ill gained?

Donald Trump does, for sure.

[TSherbs]

TS-
Didn't mean to make you frustrated.
"Now do" ____ is a shorthand way of saying apply the same analysis you used before to this new subject.
Take your comment about Trump, that whether or not he believes he lost the election disqualifies him from office, and apply it to Hillary Rodham Clinton and her tearful reading of her acceptance speech, not believing that she could have/should have lost the election but for that pesky Electoral College, and try and convince people that she's a worthy candidate for president.
Or, same crap runs both ways.

Are you typing this with a straight face? Seriously, are you? That's your level of analysis for DQ of Clinton? That she was sad that she lost on election night ....to Trump's orchestrated response over months to coerce, cajole, and litigate the states and then pressure Congress and then the VP into refusing the certified results of the outcome? And to continue to vilify and threaten those who won't toe his fraud-line to this day two years later?

I'm flabbergasted, except maybe this is one of your ironic jokes and you just are writing something you don't actually believe.