He is now trying to distance himself from Trump by calling his orange .
He is now trying to distance himself from Trump by calling his orange .
Wrong? Perhaps he was just trying to state the opposing view even if he didn't agree with it. That's the way one discusses a topic, not by just stating one side's opinion. Roughly half the country opposed your view. Without trying to see their perspective, how can you analyze the conflict? Do you think everyone who thought differently is just "mentally challenged"?
Typos courtesy of Samsung Auto-Incorrect™
M: I came here for a good argument.
A: No you didn't; no, you came here for an argument.
M: An argument isn't just contradiction.
A: It can be.
M: No it can't. An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition.
A: No it isn't.
M: Yes it is! It's not just contradiction.
A: Look, if I argue with you, I must take up a contrary position.
M: Yes, but that's not just saying 'No it isn't.'
A: Yes it is!
M: No it isn't!
Chuck Naill (June 23rd, 2022)
A better way might me to say that I feel @dneal is wrong and here is why. Drawing from my post of Mark Sheilds, this is how he might have countered Brooks. I think once he said David hasn't been right about any of this today. Would you consider this reply to be satisfactory?
Bookmarks