See how you dodge? I'm not talking about the number of questions you've answered here.
You don't see a point to answering MY questions, because this time I'm not leading you away from an unsubstantiated opinion that you don't really have any emotional ties to. I'm challenging your narrative, and you don't have a cogent response.
It's a theme here. The bullshit gets called out, and the demeanor changes and the name calling begins. Trolls and Trumpists everywhere. You guys like to blame me, and whatever... But the reason you all get so pissy is because of the cognitive dissonance. Look how merely mentioning ivermectin triggers Chuck and reduces him to babbling nonsense. "HORSE DEWORMER!!!" Talk about Hunter's laptop and suddenly no one is as adamant about rule of law and corruption. Instead, it's "WHATABOUTISM". I've half a mind to point out to Chuck that YouTube is accessible on the computers at the public library, just to see what nonsense he responds with.
Isn't is odd that scottt experienced something similar? He beat several of the usual malcontents senseless with facts and reason, and predictably he became everything from a troll to a RWW. I'm not a variable in that equation, so how did that happen? Maybe your calculus is wrong and it's not me... Hmmmm.
Don't you think it's curious that scottt and Seney have identified the same problem of leftist narratives here? I gave you facts and reason on a topic you apparently don't have a lot of investment in (guns), you changed your mind somewhat, and lord have you been patting yourself on the back for it. You're so objective now - or are you? What in the conspiratorial screed you linked in the OP is anything other than leftist narrative? Best I can tell, you haven't really commented on your article at all so far in this thread; except in the most indirect mentions of "Q-Anon".
You really should listen to Scott Adams.
Bookmarks