View Poll Results: Why do you not post in the Politics, Religion, Society sub-forum? (select multiple)

Voters
31. You may not vote on this poll
  • Did not know it existed.

    1 3.23%
  • Not interested in discussing these topics here.

    17 54.84%
  • The tone of the discussions is too combative.

    13 41.94%
  • Not sufficient moderation by admin

    5 16.13%
  • Other (please explain below)

    6 19.35%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Results 1 to 20 of 47

Thread: Member feedback poll on Off-Topic thread participation

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    1,747
    Thanks
    4,864
    Thanked 4,828 Times in 1,163 Posts
    Rep Power
    12

    Default Re: Member feedback poll on Off-Topic thread participation

    Coincidentally, this came up in my podcast feed.

    We Need to Argue With Each Other
    Slate’s new podcast makes the case for fighting without winners.
    On today’s episode of Hear Me Out… host Celeste Headlee introduces Slate’s newest podcast with a question: what if we could argue with each other without hating the results?
    Hugh Breakey, writer and moral philosopher, thinks it’s possible. He and Celeste discuss the case for arguing with each other on difficult topics, and giving up the idea that every argument needs a winner. It’s not just a good idea, according to Breakey — it’s a moral imperative.
    https://slate.com/podcasts/hearmeout...ral-imperative

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to catbert For This Useful Post:

    Jon Szanto (March 22nd, 2023), JulieParadise (March 22nd, 2023), TSherbs (March 22nd, 2023)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •