View Poll Results: Why do you not post in the Politics, Religion, Society sub-forum? (select multiple)

Voters
31. You may not vote on this poll
  • Did not know it existed.

    1 3.23%
  • Not interested in discussing these topics here.

    17 54.84%
  • The tone of the discussions is too combative.

    13 41.94%
  • Not sufficient moderation by admin

    5 16.13%
  • Other (please explain below)

    6 19.35%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 47

Thread: Member feedback poll on Off-Topic thread participation

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    6,656
    Thanks
    2,026
    Thanked 2,188 Times in 1,418 Posts
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Member feedback poll on Off-Topic thread participation

    Over the years (10) that I have been here, participation on the "Politics, Religion, and Society" threads has declined to barely a trickle. I am curious as to why. So I have made a poll to see if members will share their thoughts on their lack of participation. Feel free also to include comments, especially if you select "Other". You may select more than one answer.

    Thank you.
    Last edited by TSherbs; March 20th, 2023 at 09:01 AM.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to TSherbs For This Useful Post:

    christof (March 20th, 2023)

  3. #2
    Senior Member LizEF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2022
    Location
    Unreality
    Posts
    726
    Thanks
    901
    Thanked 1,300 Times in 547 Posts
    Rep Power
    3

    Default Re: Member feedback poll on Off-Topic thread participation

    FWIW, it has been my experience that online discussions of religion and politics go like this:

    A: "You believe X, which is [insert negative adjectives here]."

    B: "I do not believe X. I believe Y."

    A: "No you don't, you liar. And anyway, Y is also [bunch of negative]."

    [devolution into vulgarity and name-calling]

    Why such discussions don't go like the following is beyond me:

    A: "I believe X."

    B: "Really? I thought you believed Y. Please explain further."

    A: "Here are some details about X."

    I suppose conversation #2 is too boring and civilized for the interwebs.

  4. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to LizEF For This Useful Post:

    catbert (March 21st, 2023), dneal (March 20th, 2023), Robert (March 20th, 2023), Yazeh (March 20th, 2023)

  5. #3
    Senior Member dneal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    5,982
    Thanks
    2,397
    Thanked 2,272 Times in 1,300 Posts
    Rep Power
    16

    Default Re: Member feedback poll on Off-Topic thread participation

    Quote Originally Posted by LizEF View Post
    FWIW, it has been my experience that online discussions of religion and politics go like this:

    A: "You believe X, which is [insert negative adjectives here]."

    B: "I do not believe X. I believe Y."

    A: "No you don't, you liar. And anyway, Y is also [bunch of negative]."

    [devolution into vulgarity and name-calling]

    Why such discussions don't go like the following is beyond me:

    A: "I believe X."

    B: "Really? I thought you believed Y. Please explain further."

    A: "Here are some details about X."

    I suppose conversation #2 is too boring and civilized for the interwebs.
    ethernautrix commented along the same lines some years ago - and she is no longer around.

    Quote Originally Posted by ethernautrix
    But I want to know, is it possible to ask questions without the knee-jerk, chest-thumping, righteous indignation beat-down that tries to pass for discourse these days? Cos "You're stupid" is not a convincing point.
    "A truth does not mind being questioned. A lie does not like being challenged."

  6. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to dneal For This Useful Post:

    calamus (March 23rd, 2023), catbert (March 20th, 2023), Chrissy (March 20th, 2023), christof (March 20th, 2023), JulieParadise (March 20th, 2023), LizEF (March 20th, 2023), Scrawler (April 9th, 2023), Yazeh (March 20th, 2023)

  7. #4
    Senior Member Jon Szanto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    6,605
    Thanks
    7,789
    Thanked 11,015 Times in 4,003 Posts
    Rep Power
    22

    Default Re: Member feedback poll on Off-Topic thread participation

    I initially suggested the creation of that sub-forum, possibly with others in concert, to the administration at the time. It may have been when Dan had a hand in running the site (the best years) but could have been earlier, when Eric still did it (and cared). It was common to have these topics intrude upon actual pen topics, and I/we felt it best that they had a place of their own. It was to be unmoderated, and also for the posts to NOT show up in the "What's New" posts, as to not trigger or click-bait people.

    I'm happy that people have used it for those purposes. With only rare exception, I never found a desire to discuss those matters in this type of setting, and my occasional reading of posts there confirmed not only that many people had/have a hard time keeping a civil tone, but that I would very likely succumb to that behavior, as well. It is a personal weakness and the best way I have to keep friendships and remain politely honest is to completely avoid that place.
    "When Men differ in Opinion, both Sides ought equally to have the Advantage of being heard by the Publick;
    and that when Truth and Error have fair Play, the former is always an overmatch for the latter."

    ~ Benjamin Franklin

  8. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Jon Szanto For This Useful Post:

    BlkWhiteFilmPix (March 20th, 2023), catbert (March 20th, 2023), christof (March 20th, 2023), Cyril (April 12th, 2023), rickap (March 20th, 2023), Yazeh (March 20th, 2023)

  9. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2021
    Posts
    460
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 149 Times in 103 Posts
    Rep Power
    3

    Default Re: Member feedback poll on Off-Topic thread participation

    Quote Originally Posted by Jon Szanto View Post
    I initially suggested the creation of that sub-forum, possibly with others in concert, to the administration at the time. It may have been when Dan had a hand in running the site (the best years) but could have been earlier, when Eric still did it (and cared). It was common to have these topics intrude upon actual pen topics, and I/we felt it best that they had a place of their own. It was to be unmoderated, and also for the posts to NOT show up in the "What's New" posts, as to not trigger or click-bait people.

    I'm happy that people have used it for those purposes. With only rare exception, I never found a desire to discuss those matters in this type of setting, and my occasional reading of posts there confirmed not only that many people had/have a hard time keeping a civil tone, but that I would very likely succumb to that behavior, as well. It is a personal weakness and the best way I have to keep friendships and remain politely honest is to completely avoid that place.
    I could not have said it better.

    Sent from my SM-G781V using Tapatalk

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Dougc For This Useful Post:

    christof (March 20th, 2023)

  11. #6
    Senior Member christof's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Confoederatio Helvetica
    Posts
    1,870
    Thanks
    1,883
    Thanked 7,777 Times in 1,422 Posts
    Rep Power
    16

    Default Re: Member feedback poll on Off-Topic thread participation

    Indeed, an interesting question (although I would have phrased it the other way around).

    I have several answers to this question at once:

    - Because I live in Switzerland and we have our own political and social problems...(but which I would not want to talk about in another place on the internet).

    - because I am not a native speaker and would not be up to the fierce verbal battles.

    - because in my free time I prefer to occupy myself with positive things rather than arguing.

    and last but not least:

    - because this is a fountain pen forum!

    Our passion for fountain pens is what we have in common. If you have argued with someone about politics, religion or society, you will never be able to have an unbiased conversation about fountain pens with the same person again.

    In short: this subforum has toxic potential. Still, it's probably a good thing that it exists. That way, all the other sub-forums can be spared toxic off topic discussions.
    Last edited by christof; March 20th, 2023 at 01:37 PM.

  12. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to christof For This Useful Post:

    + Show/Hide list of the thanked

    BlkWhiteFilmPix (March 20th, 2023), carlos.q (March 22nd, 2023), catbert (March 20th, 2023), Jon Szanto (March 20th, 2023), JulieParadise (March 20th, 2023), LizEF (March 20th, 2023), mizgeorge (March 21st, 2023), Robert (March 20th, 2023), RobJohnson (March 20th, 2023), Stands on Feet (March 20th, 2023), Yazeh (March 20th, 2023)

  13. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    6,656
    Thanks
    2,026
    Thanked 2,188 Times in 1,418 Posts
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: Member feedback poll on Off-Topic thread participation

    I appreciate all these comments thus far. Thank you. Let's see what more might be added over the coming days.

    It's also my sense that user traffic and participation is lower than it used to be, particularly outside of the sales threads. There are many user names I don't see anymore anywhere on the site.

  14. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    1,703
    Thanks
    136
    Thanked 605 Times in 442 Posts
    Rep Power
    12

    Default Re: Member feedback poll on Off-Topic thread participation

    Quote Originally Posted by christof View Post
    If you have argued with someone about politics, religion or society, you will never be able to have an unbiased conversation about fountain pens with the same person again.

    While you may feel this way, it is inaccurate as a blanket statement.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to kazoolaw For This Useful Post:

    Chuck Naill (April 19th, 2023)

  16. #9
    Senior Member christof's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Confoederatio Helvetica
    Posts
    1,870
    Thanks
    1,883
    Thanked 7,777 Times in 1,422 Posts
    Rep Power
    16

    Default Re: Member feedback poll on Off-Topic thread participation

    Quote Originally Posted by kazoolaw View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by christof View Post
    If you have argued with someone about politics, religion or society, you will never be able to have an unbiased conversation about fountain pens with the same person again.

    While you may feel this way, it is inaccurate as a blanket statement.
    I correct myself:

    If I have argued with someone about politics, religion or society, I will never be able to have an unbiased conversation about fountain pens with the same person again.

  17. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to christof For This Useful Post:

    carlos.q (March 22nd, 2023), catbert (March 21st, 2023), Yazeh (March 20th, 2023)

  18. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Posts
    308
    Thanks
    264
    Thanked 424 Times in 204 Posts
    Rep Power
    4

    Default Re: Member feedback poll on Off-Topic thread participation

    I had voted that it was a an environment that was too combative, however, given the subject matter of politics, religion and society it is a forum that tends to attract debate and argument.

    To be honest I would rather that we continue to ring fence the hotheads who want to debate PR and S and to know that this is a no go zone for me.

    On another unrelated forum there is a learned legal adviser who has suggested that a forum that permits contentious debate in breach of good social order could find itself to be in a difficult position, legally.

  19. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    1,703
    Thanks
    136
    Thanked 605 Times in 442 Posts
    Rep Power
    12

    Default Re: Member feedback poll on Off-Topic thread participation

    As Jon outlined above, the sub-forum was set up intentionally without moderation. Kind of a quarantine. Note the introduction: "Not for the faint hearted," and "You have been warned."
    Debate is not for everyone, but there is a reason it is part of scholastic forensic programs. It teaches logic, discipline, and speaking skills. In that setting the debate is about the issue, not the opposing debater.
    Can/does debate slide down into ad hominem attacks and vitriol? Yes it can, and it does.
    All of life, as christof alluded to, is not an argument, nor even a debate.
    One last thought, gotta be careful of which lawyer, learned or otherwise, gets to define the "breach of good social order."

  20. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kazoolaw For This Useful Post:

    dneal (March 21st, 2023), Jon Szanto (March 20th, 2023)

  21. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    1,702
    Thanks
    4,706
    Thanked 4,586 Times in 1,120 Posts
    Rep Power
    12

    Default Re: Member feedback poll on Off-Topic thread participation

    'Not interested ...' Partly — it's very US-centric and doesn't seem to go anywhere.

    '... too combative.' Partly. Nothing wrong with vigorous debate, but often it looks more like abuse than argument.

    For those who do participate in that part of the forum, what is the appeal?

  22. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to catbert For This Useful Post:

    christof (March 21st, 2023), Scrawler (April 9th, 2023), Yazeh (March 21st, 2023)

  23. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    SFO USA
    Posts
    1,374
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked 1,112 Times in 573 Posts
    Rep Power
    12

    Default Re: Member feedback poll on Off-Topic thread participation

    I thought Facebook and Tritter filled this void.

  24. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Farmboy For This Useful Post:

    christof (March 21st, 2023), Scrawler (April 9th, 2023)

  25. #14
    Senior Member LizEF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2022
    Location
    Unreality
    Posts
    726
    Thanks
    901
    Thanked 1,300 Times in 547 Posts
    Rep Power
    3

    Default Re: Member feedback poll on Off-Topic thread participation

    Quote Originally Posted by catbert View Post
    .... but often it looks more like abuse than argument.
    Exactly my point. All I can figure is that some people think their abuse / insults / derision constitute "debate".

    Quote Originally Posted by catbert View Post
    For those who do participate in that part of the forum, what is the appeal?
    Good question.

  26. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to LizEF For This Useful Post:

    BlkWhiteFilmPix (March 22nd, 2023), catbert (March 21st, 2023), Scrawler (April 9th, 2023), Stands on Feet (March 21st, 2023), Yazeh (March 21st, 2023)

  27. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    6,656
    Thanks
    2,026
    Thanked 2,188 Times in 1,418 Posts
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: Member feedback poll on Off-Topic thread participation

    Quote Originally Posted by catbert View Post


    For those who do participate in that part of the forum, what is the appeal?
    Fair question. Very subjective answers, I assume. Even as early as 2nd grade, my parents asked me (and my siblings) to cut out newspaper articles and present the topics to the family at the dinner table. Thus began my "interest" (or at least a certain habit). I have been interested more deeply in those topics since I was about 16. In high school, I used to stay up late at night in "bullshit sessions" on these topics. We had just been through the end of the Viet Nam war and Watergate, so political engagement was continuing to rise. I read the papers, went to some town meetings, joined protest marches, sit-ins, etc. I wrote for my university paper on several current topics. I made friends through these various activities. I'm over 60 now, and still am energized by these topics and the discussion of them. I am intrigued by the workings of law and the topics of justice and religion.

    Here, the "appeal" has waned for me over the years. Mostly now I just consider myself a voice for a certain point of view. I *try* now to avoid debate, argument, diatribe, etc (I am not perfect in this restraint), but I also don't want my point of view to be lost simply because the conversation gets nasty or personal. So now I mostly just express it, and move along. Some old habitual behaviors die harder than others, however.

  28. The Following User Says Thank You to TSherbs For This Useful Post:

    catbert (March 21st, 2023)

  29. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    6,656
    Thanks
    2,026
    Thanked 2,188 Times in 1,418 Posts
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: Member feedback poll on Off-Topic thread participation

    And thanks again for the thoughtful responses to the prompt.

  30. #17
    Member JulieParadise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Berlin/Germany
    Posts
    42
    Thanks
    216
    Thanked 79 Times in 35 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: Member feedback poll on Off-Topic thread participation

    Quote Originally Posted by catbert View Post
    So great, thank you!

  31. #18
    Senior Member manoeuver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Near Midwest, US
    Posts
    1,592
    Thanks
    1,225
    Thanked 1,078 Times in 554 Posts
    Rep Power
    15

    Default Re: Member feedback poll on Off-Topic thread participation

    I used to post in there. It became toxic as fuck and (for me) ultimately pointless.
    A sour stew of imported talking points and bad faith.
    Life has improved since I quit going in there. I do peek in once in a while.

  32. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to manoeuver For This Useful Post:

    Deb (April 19th, 2023), TSherbs (March 21st, 2023)

  33. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    6,656
    Thanks
    2,026
    Thanked 2,188 Times in 1,418 Posts
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: Member feedback poll on Off-Topic thread participation

    @manoeuver You're not the only one to express this. Honestly, your presence (or lack) is one of my belle-weathers for the tone of those back pages. You do what you need.

  34. #20
    Senior Member manoeuver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Near Midwest, US
    Posts
    1,592
    Thanks
    1,225
    Thanked 1,078 Times in 554 Posts
    Rep Power
    15

    Default Re: Member feedback poll on Off-Topic thread participation

    Quote Originally Posted by TSherbs View Post
    @manoeuver You're not the only one to express this. Honestly, your presence (or lack) is one of my belle-weathers for the tone of those back pages. You do what you need.
    Thanks TSherbs. You are good at having nuanced conversations, which is what I was after in there. happy to discourse with you via email whenever you like.

  35. The Following User Says Thank You to manoeuver For This Useful Post:

    TSherbs (March 22nd, 2023)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •