Awesome review. Although I am initially intrigued by any "author" ink, I will pass on this one--since it is terrible on my favorite paper. Besides, NT did not choose an ash-grey for this ink, which is an error in palette selection to match the tonal mood of the book (and dominant color reference of the opening page....as the clock strikes thirteen and the rubbish and dust are blown about the streets...)
Opening sentence:
a little further down the page:
Outside, even through the shut window-pane, the world looked cold. Down in the street little eddies of wind were whirling dust and torn paper into spirals, and though the sun was shining and the sky a harsh blue, there seemed to be no colour in anything, except the posters that were plastered everywhere. The black-moustachio'd face gazed down from every commanding corner. There was one on the house-front immediately opposite. BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU, the caption said, while the dark eyes looked deep into Winston's own. Down at street level another poster, torn at one corner, flapped fitfully in the wind, alternately covering and uncovering the single word INGSOC. In the far distance a helicopter skimmed down between the roofs, hovered for an instant like a bluebottle, and darted away again with a curving flight. It was the police patrol, snooping into people's windows. The patrols did not matter, however. Only the Thought Police mattered.
Anyway, this to me was like OS choosing "pink" for Emily Dickinson (an outrage), and Montblanc going with a nearly invisible robins-egg blue for "Miles Davis" (at least they got the "blue" part right).
Anyway, I take author/artist inks seriously (and personally ha!)
Now, if one were to read the book
Orwell's Roses, you might decide to go for pink or yellow. Go figure!
Bookmarks